My Name Is Steve Bashear & I Approve Of Rape&Torture
Governor of Kentucky...(look at his teeth)................WHAT THEY KNOW NOVEMBER 24, 2010.
Shunned Profiling Technology on the Verge of Comeback
By STEVE STECKLOW and PAUL SONNE
One of the most potentially intrusive technologies for profiling and targeting Internet users with ads is on the verge of a comeback, two years after an outcry by privacy advocates in the U.S. and Britain appeared to kill it.
The technology, known as "deep packet inspection," is capable of reading and analyzing the "packets" of data traveling across the Internet. It can be far more powerful than "cookies" and other techniques commonly used to track people online because it can be used to monitor all online activity, not just Web browsing. Spy agencies use the technology for surveillance.
Now, two U.S. companies, Kindsight Inc. and Phorm Inc., are pitching deep packet inspection services as a way for Internet service providers to claim a share of the lucrative online ad market.
Kindsight and Phorm say they protect people's privacy with steps that include obtaining their consent. They also say they don't use the full power of the technology, and refrain from reading email and analyzing sensitive online activities.
Use of deep packet inspection this way would nonetheless give advertisers the ability to show ads to people based on extremely detailed profiles of their Internet activity. To persuade Internet users to opt in to be profiled, Kindsight will offer a free security service, while Phorm promises to provide customized web content such as news articles tailored to users' interests. Both would share ad revenue with the ISPs.
Kindsight says its technology is sensitive enough to detect whether a particular person is online for work, or for fun, and can target ads accordingly.
CEO Kent Ertugrul outside Phorm's office in London. The company studies people's interests based on websites they visit to show them ads. "If you're trying to engage in one-stop-shopping surveillance on the Internet, deep packet inspection would be an awesome tool," says David C. Vladeck, director of the Federal Trade Commission's Bureau of Consumer Protection. When deep packet inspection is used for targeted ads, the FTC has made it clear that broadband providers "should, at a minimum, notify consumers that the ISP was mining the information and obtain clear consumer consent," Mr. Vladeck says.
Kindsight, majority owned by telecommunications giant Alcatel-Lucent SA, says six ISPs in the U.S., Canada and Europe have been testing its security service this year although it isn't yet delivering targeted ads. It declined to name the clients.
"These are tier-one ISPs we're working with," says Mike Gassewitz, Kindsight's chief executive. He says his company also has been placing ads on various websites to test the ad-placement technology and build up a base of advertisers, which now number about 100,000.
Two large ISPs in Brazil—Oi, a unit of Tele Norte Leste Participacoes SA, and Telefonica SA—currently have deals with Phorm. Oi, Brazil's largest broadband provider with about 4.5 million customers, has launched the product initially with about 10,000 people in Rio De Janeiro.
"We want to grow that," says Pedro Ripper, Oi's strategy and technology director.
A spokesman for Telefonica says it is testing the service on about 1,000 broadband customers and will evaluate the results before deciding whether to roll it out. "The user has the choice to enable or disable the service anytime he or she wants to," the company said in a statement.
Phorm is hoping to introduce its service in South Korea and eventually in the U.S. "It is designed from the ground up to ensure one thing and that is privacy," says Kent Ertugrul, Phorm's chief executive.
Kindsight and Phorm say the ISPs don't provide them with subscribers' real identities. Both also say they don't collect any personal information, read email, store users' browsing histories or monitor sensitive sites such as health blogs. Subscribers must "opt in," or give their consent to participate, both companies say.
Both the Kindsight and Phorm systems study people's behavior and interests based on the websites they visit to show them relevant ads. Mr. Gassewitz says that unlike web-based tracking methods, which generally create a single behavioral profile no matter how many people share a computer, Kindsight can "generate multiple characters per human."
"If I come online and I'm in work mode, I will show up as a very different character than when I go online Saturday morning and I'm in recreation mode," he says. The targeted ads would reflect which "character" is online.
Mr. Gassewitz calls that some of Kindsight's "secret sauce." The company this year filed a patent on its "character differentiation" technology.
A new revenue source would mark a welcome change for ISPs. The companies have been under pressure to offer ever-faster Internet services at lower prices, while Google Inc. and other companies raked in billions of dollars selling ads. Targeted ads based on people's interests or behavior generally fetch higher fees.
ISPs "feel like they have data and they ought to be able to use it," says Tim McElgunn, chief analyst at Pike & Fischer Broadband Advisory Services. "They really desperately want to."
This isn't the first time ISPs have tried this. Two years ago, ISPs in the U.S. and Britain signed deals with companies offering deep packet inspection services and a cut of ad revenue.
Those pacts fell apart after a privacy outcry. In the U.K., an uproar ensued after BT Group PLC admitted it had tested Phorm's technology on some subscribers without telling them. Last year, BT and two other British ISPs that explored deploying Phorm's service—Virgin Media Inc. and TalkTalk—abandoned it.
.In the U.S., controversy erupted in 2008 over the practices of a company called NebuAd Inc., which planned to use deep packet inspection to deliver targeted advertising to millions of broadband subscribers unless they explicitly opted out of the service. At a congressional hearing, Bob Dykes, the company's founder, was grilled over its policy. NebuAd stopped doing business last year; several U.S. ISPs who signed deals with NebuAd have been hit with class-action lawsuits accusing them of "installing spyware devices" on their networks.
In an interview, Mr. Dykes said, "If I had to do things over again, I would have figured out how to architect an opt-in model."
The companies now offering ad services based on deep packet inspection believe they have learned how to make the services acceptable to privacy advocates and Internet users. This includes asking for permission up front and offering people incentives to receive targeted ads, such as Kindsight's free security service, which includes identity-theft protection. Customers can pay a monthly fee to receive no ads.
Mr. Gassewitz says six ISPs have tested Kindsight's security service on subscriber groups as big as 200,000. Mr. Gassewitz says, "There was no profiling occurring, no advertising occurring, no data collection occurring."
Oi's Mr. Ripper believes that the technology's time has come. "The Internet is becoming more and more a platform to deliver very targeted messages," he says. As for deep packet inspection, "Everyone is going to get there. It's just a matter of timing."
In February 2008, Britain's biggest ISPs—BT, Virgin Media and TalkTalk—announced plans to implement Phorm's service. Those plans quickly unraveled.
Suspicions earlier had arisen among some BT subscribers who discovered they were being routed through an unfamiliar Internet address when they tried to visit a website. Some of them contacted BT and were advised their computer might be infected with a virus, according to a person familiar with the matter.
A BT spokesman said it is "standard procedure" to take customers through "a number of steps to try and identify the issue" if they call with a question about their service.
In fact, the subscribers were part of tests BT conducted in 2006 and 2007 using Phorm's technology. When BT disclosed the testing in April 2008, the backlash was fierce, with online protests by privacy advocates and government investigations. Four members of the board of directors later resigned, including former AT&T chief executive David Dorman and ex-Coca-Cola Co. president Steven Heyer, citing differences with Mr. Ertugrul. Messrs. Dorman and Heyer declined to comment.